Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Tax Justice Network: Does the EU want a president who opposes co-operation?
There we go! One non-candidate is now an "unofficial" candidate. All non-candidates can escalate their non-candidacy into an "unofficial" candidacy. All "unofficial" candidates have to submit then to a "non-vote". We European citizens will be "non-voters" and cast no vote for "unoffiicial" candidates who have no program. It is so much better to have in fine an "unofficial" President rather than a non-President.
There would be some logic if that "unofficial" President is a "non-cooperative" President.
Egide Thein
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Luxembourg, Tony Blair, Luc Frieden, Tony Blair, Jean-Claude Juncker, Tony Blair, Andy Schleck, Tony Blair.
I just wanted to see what's doing in Luxembourg. And, hop! Tony Blair pops up on my screen as the non candidate leading a pack of four non candidates for the European Presidency. According to London bookmakers, Luxembourg's Juncker is number four in that race, as I learn from the popup. He, himself only an outsider!?
Actually I only wanted to double check on what friends in New York, by all means, told me to do urgently: Luxembourg's Minister of Finance Luc Frieden it appeared had found his way out of denial and of the frenzied defense of the Luxembourg bank secrecy. The very official website says, (or said):
Afin de garantir la position de la place financière du Luxembourg après la crise, "il ne suffit plus de défendre la situation actuelle, mais il y a lieu de définir une nouvelle orientation pour notre place. Une position constamment défensive peut en effet susciter des réactions à l’instar de celles de l’avant-dernier sommet du G20 !".
I went to the google engine which translates automatically, not without a popup that says that London bookmakers have Tony Blair leading the pack of non candidates 4-1. Though he denies being a candidate, as there isn't yet a job opening. Thanks for your patience, here is the translation, and I won't change a word, in order to make sure my personal bias doesn't infiltrate the text:
To ensure the position of the Luxembourg financial market after the crisis, "it is no longer enough to defend the current situation, but it is necessary to define a new direction for us. A constant defensive position may indeed provoke reactions like those of the penultimate G20 summit! "
Are we finally turning to reality? Question the indefensible? Let's see online what Prime Minister Juncker has to say on that same subject.
First Tony Blair pops up. He is leading the pack of non candidates but Mr. Juncker and his Benelux colleagues do believe he shouldn't lead the pack of non candidates as the favorite non candidate. Some say if there should be a leading candidate among non candidates, it should definitely be JCJ. Blair doesn't speak a word of Luxembourgish, which should disqualify him! Though Blair was not my question. Those popups are so distracting! The question was Juncker's stand on bank secrecy, because Luc Frieden seems to give in to reality, brutal reality.
Not so fast. Only over my dead Presidency says Juncker, who anyway is not a candidate unless someone would ask him, which would be premature, as there is no job opening yet. The Luxembourg bank secrecy may well be like a sand castle on the beach. Juncker is going to defend it to the last grain of sand! And let's say it again: too bad if the European Presidency, where he isn't a candidate, is lost.
This isn't Luxembourg anymore. This is ancient Greece! Choking Drama! Or maybe Shakespearean tragedy, because of the undeletable popup. It is all but the same development, a slow but inescapable climax. We know our heroes are lined up to meet Destiny. Dark clouds gather over the frightfully calm ocean. As mighty Stratocumulus sarkozyus and Cumulus merkelensius are swelling with anger, everyone knows, the sand castle and its defender are doomed.
Only Tony Blair thinks it is a good idea for Juncker to try hold out. Perfidy! He wants you eliminated from the lot of non candidates, or even worse: he wants that no one even asks you to be a candidate. How treacherous!
Let me get you someone in the real world to guide your strategies, all of you. Go to www.letour.fr to see information about the Tour de France 2010. I bet you 4-1, that first Tony Blair will pop up. Delete, and watch Andy Schleck at the presentation. He knows that being second doesn't win the Tour. He says he is going to race and he is in it to win.
That's honest talk. He says he is a candidate. He is not saying that he isn't yet a candidate because someone has to ask him to be a candidate. And he is in it to win. He also knows that the one, Tony or someone else, who leads a sprint too early, is not going to win. As is the one who plays sand castle and lingers in fourth position. That's too far behind.
Though Andy Schleck knows how this all works, he cannot be a candidate for President. He says openly, honestly, he wants to win the Tour 2010. Now don't do this to me. As no one seems to be a candidate, I dread the day when they call me out of retirement! But let me tell you right away: I'll only accept if my place of work remains Naples Florida.
Egide Thein
Ech schwëtzen Lëtzebuergesch, Je parle français, Ich spreche Deutsch, Hablo español, Falo Português, Io parlo italiano, Ik spreek Nederlands, Jeg taler dansk, Jag talar svenska, Μιλώ ελληνικά, Mówię Polski, Eu nu vorbesc limba română, Аз говоря български, I speak magyar,
Or at least I'm going to learn. But I do understand Tony Blair's language.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
‘Elephant’ has finally charged » Comment » This Is Guernsey
Posted using ShareThis
This is well in line with my former blogs on egidethein.blogspot.com and the French language blog feierwon.blogspot.com. Well in line, but it still is a surprisingly fast and brutal blow at a not so much expected place. One could have assumed some biased protection from the British tutor for some time. This is the most serious signal that tax havens and "paradis fiscaux" are to be smoked out. Those who push the startegy, expect to repatriate billions of tax dollars/euros/etc.
The Guernsey Income Tax (Zero - 10) system basically is taxing resident companies at 20% on worldwide income. But companies that are wholly owned by non-residents and have no Guernsey source income are subjected to either 0% or 10% corporate tax since 2008.
The consequences of the war on tax havens will be immeasurable on those jurisdictions, the Channel Islands and many Caribbean Islands. I would argue that the powers out there might well have to intervene in support of the economies of most of their targets.
Alea jacta est!
Tour de France 2010 and Contador, Armstrong, Schleck Previewing
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Luxembourg drives Union to distraction
http://www.europolitics.info/europolitics/luxembourg-drives-union-to-distraction-art250833-46.html
Hopefully it is not true. I would feel sorry for Luxembourg and Switzerland.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
AddThis - Sharing http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labou...
Shared via AddThis
Friday, October 9, 2009
Testimony of Cynthia Stroum Ambassador-Designate to The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Switzerland: How Polanski could be the Slippery Slope from Tax Haven to Judiciary Haven Designation
"Wenn I numme wüsst ..."
A Swiss friend corrects me on my former post. Polanski bought his property in 2006 only, though he vacationed for years in Switzerland. Please see this article in Neue Zürcher Zeitung, NZZ Online (in German):
http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/bund_hat_polanskis_hauskauf_in_gstaad_bewilligt_1.3780141.html
Funny thing is, Polanski had been on an international arrest warrant for 6 months already, when on April 28, 2006 he acquired property at Chalet "Milky Way" in Gstaad, Switzerland, registered under # 4466-2 and assessed at CHF 1,600,000. The market value is supposed to be much higher.
Not only was there at the time an international arrest warrant. The cantonal economic offices and the Federal Justice Department both gave their written consent to the transaction, as required by Swiss law for foreigners buying property in Switzerland, to French-Polish national Roman Raymond Polanski-Seigner. Swiss officials assert that the law does not require them to do any background checks.
Obviously this story again verifies the equation: tax haven = judiciary haven = regulatory haven.
It just turns water on the mill of those who will pursue the next crusade against judicial havens. Switzerland will be on someone's soon to come list of judicial and regulatory havens, though not alone. Luxembourg will be there too, among all the other usual suspects. That prediction is easy to verify: just follow certain legislation being incubated at the US Congress, under Congressman Barney Frank's Committee.
NZZ rather impatiently raises the question: in our Administration, doesn't the left hand know what the right hand is doing? If there is an arrest warrant in the left hand, shouldn't the right hand deny the required approval, or better, proceed to arrest the prospective buyer, right there?
The official answer is "no". There is no requirement that would provide an obligation for the left hand to know what the right hand is doing. Good answer, but that was close!
Imagine the answer had been "yes"! Then proof would be there that Switzerland is really a judiciary haven! You could easily surmise that Polanski was left alone for so many years, because he was rich and famous. Polanski's sudden arrest then by the left hand had to be somewhat linked to the right hand's trouble with UBS in the US, another sign of judicial despotism . Luckily, we are assured now by the Administration that it isn't so. One has nothing to do with the other.
Careful though with those assurances. They make both hands willfully blind by design, another definition of a judicial and regulatory haven. Switzerland, you cannot win the argument.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Crime and Punishment: Switzerland, the U.S.A., France, Poland, the Taliban and Hollywood have different standards for the Roman Polanski tragicomedy.
Let's see what is in it for Luxembourg.
In just days after Roman Polanski was arrested in Switzerland for rape charges of a 13 year old girl in the US in 1977, the world is a patchwork of different conflicting reactions. Here is the human tragicomedy.
1. Switzerland
Switzerland says the law is the law, and rape is rape, and rape is a crime, also in Switzerland. We are going to arrest the man and extradite him. The world should not confuse this with Swiss policies on tax evasion, which does not exist in Switzerland. It is called private banking, and Switzerland doesn't extradite private banking clients. Or refugees. But encourages worldwide amnesties.
I wonder if 40 years ago, when Polanski bought property in Gstaad, Switzerland, a crime was a crime?
2. USA
The US Justice Department says, "who said do nothing Justice? We want him to be arrested, and we want him now. He committed a crime and he pleaded guilty."
The victim it appears just wants to see the story go away. I hope the lady gets advice and understands that she can get even with the guilty man. There is money on the table. Even a Swiss Chalet in Gstaad. Did you watch the Swiss Franc recently?
3. France
The only balanced opinion in the whole world comes from France: half the French Government wants to see the charges dropped after 40 years. The other half thinks he should pay for the crime. That's a really balanced position.
Liberté, Fraternité etcetera. I remember, there was that third principle, right there in the middle, but I can't figure which one it was.
4. Poland
As the other Great Daughter of the Catholic Church, Poland doesn't ignore that a sin has been committed. But Polanski's Polish link is a sort of discount coupon that you can exchange for impunity. But you must confess, which he has done with the guilty plea. And you are supposed to do penitence. No! That word has no sexual connotation!
5. The Taliban
Clear case: forty whiplashes for the victim.
6. Hollywood and Luxembourg and Switzerland again.
Whoopi Goldberg always makes me laugh and she has great political capital in public opinion. She said that what Polanski pleaded guilty for, was not "rape, rape". This is the greatest creation and conceptual advance in communication. The Luxembourg Government should hire her as a consultant, if the Catholic Church in the US hasn't yet hired her.
Let's try this whoopi in real life: "Officer, I wasn't really "speeding speeding."
For Luxembourg, even for Switzerland, this can be used to get out of the moving sands of international criticism. If the Swiss can agree to quit their stubborn attitude that a crime is a crime. Just change it into a crime is not always a "crime crime." A tax haven is not a "haven haven." A crook is not a "crook crook." A bonus is not a "bonus bonus". I know, you got it.
The only remaining category of people with an interest in this story are:
7. Parents of 13 year old girls
Parents, you know best all by yourselves.
Finally for "crooks crooks" this is good news, though it is not really news in Luxembourg where it is common wisdom. The longer a case is delayed, the better the chances to get away with your "crime crime". In Luxembourg, nine out of ten bankruptcies are fraudulent. According to whom ? According to common wisdom. Not only is there impunity. The crooks turn around and restart the same business again, with a clean slate. I have once been a "victim victim" there, years ago. I'm all blue by now, holding my breath for any resolution, for 6 years already. There will be no resolution this year.
Human Justice is "relative relative" in all senses of the term.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Luxembourg: Onshoring the hedge fund industry
http://blogs.reuters.com/hedgehub/2009/10/02/onshoring-the-hedge-fund-industry/
After another disastrous couple of weeks, where Dexia BIL announced employment cuts, despite the very generous bailout by the Luxembourg Government (read people), after having mismanaged itself in hole, it is the German Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg (LBBW) which closes its doors in Luxembourg. Another 200 jobs are gone with no one seeing an easy replacement.
There was a time when both Dexia BIL and LBBW were among the highest rated banks in Luxembourg. At LBBW at least everyone, from employees to management, seems to suffer the consequences from wreckless banking.
At Dexia BIL and Dexia-RBC it is 200-300 sailors who have to swim, though they just landed 25% of Dexias global profits? The captains stay on the boat. We need many hedge funds to compensate for those employment losses. Oh, yes, the politically correct label is early retirement and voluntary resignation.
Hello! Employment goes down in Luxembourg, no matter what the label tries to say!
Egide Thein