Andy Schleck today was in yellow. Indeed
he was declared the winner, just now in 2012, of the Tour de France 2010, after
Alberto Contador lost his victory to the "contaminated beef" from a
corrida doping case against him. For Andy Schleck it is a bitter victory,
because he was denied the usual glory, thrill and fun of touring the Champs
Elysées in 2010 as the winner. And his fans were
deprived too. His victory will forever carry a footnote, saying "after the
disqualification of Alberto Contador".
The way Andy Schleck got the yellow jersey
is almost a metaphor for what is wrong with 2012, and why he might not win 2
Tours the same year: This was a victory on paper by the end of the day, and the
day he was clad in yellow, Andy Schleck was not a champion in top form. Actually
for both Schlecks, the 2012 season has not been brilliant. But it shouldn't be
that way. On paper they are two athletes
who have great talent and can do
very well. They have on paper the strongest team. They have on paper the
infrastructure to support many victories, the most gifted and capable professionals
managing and caring for the team. So where are the results, where is the
problem?
It is somewhat unproductive and
unhelpful to blame the Schlecks. To a certain point. The blame has actually to
be something else, such as tough love. That's what they need, and tough love
here it is:
You both are extremely gifted. So was
Charly Gaul in the 50ies. Individually, that is great to have. But without a
team all three of you could only be prima donnas. When Charly Gaul got this,
after many glorious feats in several Tours without a final victory, and was accepting
the evidence and listened to advice, that added up to his 1958 victory. His
path to victory was talent, training, suffering and self-discipline. Those are all
the physical and the mental ingredients that makes a winner.
I
was always convinced that in modern cycling, apart from the good luck to have
great natural talent, all other attributes get acquired by methodological and
science based physical and mental training. You do have the magical manager who
set the scene for Lance Armstrong's many victories. Don't fight the magic.
Physical preparedness can be fixed. Be careful of the emotional side and the negativity
of conflict. It messes up the whole team.
Emotional preparedness comes with
adhering to the idea that you have the best managers, that you are motivated,
that many people contributed to get you the best team, that the Luxembourg public will again camp on the slopes of the
Alps to fire you up. But you have to be motivated, stick together with that
team, work hard, persevere, suffer, impress the competition not only with your
skills, but also your willpower.
No one can answer questions like these
more accurately, and hopefully honestly than you: Did I prepare thoroughly for
the 2012 season, do I want very badly to win, not only for me, but my team and
my public, did I get out of recent competitions too easily, was I at the limit
of my suffering, do I have the discipline to follow my preparation plan, even
when no one is watching and lastly can I really subdue my tendency to reject
authority and submit to the directions of a manager? All it takes is a quiet
moment of deep honest if not brutal introspection.
You have it all together on paper, an
exceptional configuration of talent, team, management and public support. That doesn't happen very
often. You are in such a privileged situation to see this through. It now is up
to you to have the willpower to make it happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment