 |
| My Orchids. Ascocenda. Photo ET |
I need to reproduce hereafter myblog from February 8, 2010, in the aftermath of the “Wolrd Conference on
Climate Change” in Copenhagen.
Actually not much has changed
except some language: we went from global warming to climate change, and now to
climate deregulation. Actually I do see some sort of uncertainty creeping into
the terminology, from the absolute certainty of warming, to change, and deregulation.
The IPCC, the UN body on Climate Change might get as afraid of the collective
hysteria they unleashed as of the catastrophe they announced, thanks to their “settled
science”.
Maybe some data over the
last 6 years showing that IPCC’s detailed catastrophic forecasts for 2015 did
not occur, reminded everyone to be more prudent. By now the settled science
appears to be more and more junk science that is feeding the news with what
appears to be more propaganda than science. By the end of the day, it is about
much money. The most telling detail is the concept of “Climate Justice”. This
says it all: compensation needs to get paid. To which countries? Well those
receiving development aid in the UN’s Millennium Program, who are also often benefiting
from UN peace-keeping, or who send out millions of refugees, excuse my
language, migrants. Climate Justice will be some kind of promotion in pay for
the eternal victims?
If COP 21 should be a
success, it should agree on diminishing pollution, and stop the nonsense of
Climate Justice and carbon trade. Being effective on pollution is all there
should be. The rest is governing, not blaming imaginary scenarios.
Please see here an account and comments about the Copenhagen Conference from 6 years ago:
No comments:
Post a Comment