My Orchids. Oncidium Bifolium. Photo ET |
Divide and Conquer at
Cargolux
Last year was the year
when Cargolux as a company was still in visual flight mode through bad weather.
The CWA negotiations provided for some interesting if not entertaining maneuvering.
Though earnings might be OK. Also, some of the past strategic issues, such as a
new Chinese shareholder or the future of Cargolux Italia were addressed in a
more or less satisfactory way and are facts now that one has to live with. So
it was the CWA negotiation that was top on the agenda, and provided for some
drama. It was a classic Battle of Interior Lines between management and the
unions, though participants might not have been aware that they engaged in classical military tactics.
In a Battle of Interior
Lines, one side, usually the one on the defensive, tries to isolate components
of the opposite side into separate smaller parts, and beats them one after the
other. It goes back to the Punic Wars, and was used for the last time by Moshe
Dayan of Israel in the Six-Day War, beating Arab adversaries one by one at a
time. The manoeuver in the Cargolux case was successful because the opponents
to Management, OGBL and LCGB were not coordinated, which split them into those two
smaller opponents that could be dealt with one at a time. It happened because
both had different agendas, were unable to bid a united front, and so they were
divided and conquered, or sort of. The situation however was a bit more complex,
because there are three winners: Management of course, but mostly OGBL and
unexpectedly all employees through the new leverage that the OGBL deal
provided.
Management of course took
advantage of the divisions to settle with OGBL first. However that settlement
was very costly, and that’s why all employees are most likely the winners. The
future will show that the negotiated clause about profit sharing is loaded with
power for the employees. Indeed there cannot be a profit sharing agreement for
employees without granting extensive rights to their representatives to look
into who is cooking the books, and whether the corporate and employees’ interests
are aligned and safeguarded in corporate decisions. Congratulations to the new
partners at the decision table.
LCGB took a hard line,
and had initiated a strike of sorts, that left aircraft grounded, about the “call-in
sick” issue. But could LCGB even afford a strike? Whereas the union
representing mostly pilots became engaged in a rhetoric spinning the
willingness to strike, the company threatened with claiming damages of Euros 3
million for the harm made to the company by the earlier strike. And the union
was happy to catch a way out of the cul de sac.
LCGB’s action was less
about CWA than about the security issues they claim management ignored. Indeed
many pilots have that concern, and it is amazing why management would take the
risk to treat the security questions with benign neglect. That safety argument
would have had a lot of leverage, unless you bring it up with no deep
conviction. On the CWA side, insiders know that management treated itself well,
as it appears that over the last two years their compensation went up by about
30% each year, with top compensations close or beyond Euros 1 million a year.
That argument would have had some leverage too in the CWA domain. Yet LCGB
blinked, leaving the battleground with nothing else than a vague settlement a
promise by Management to drop claims for damages in a lawsuit that wasn’t even
yet brought. And yes, there will be a Commission to deal with the unresolved questions.
You cannot talk this into a success. CV Management clearly won this one. The underlying
lack of unity among unions is of course the competition for dominance. It will
really be played out at the next elections when employees choose their new union
leaders.
In the meantime the
employees are winners with the OGBL agreement: the profit sharing and the right
to be informed that comes with it goes beyond what people expect it to be
today. It is a milestone. The ones hurt however are those pilots who now are on
the black list of what the company may call illegal strikers. Are they left out
there in the rain? Unless LCGB had the wisdom to demand that any mention of
their participation in the “strike” be expunged from their personal files.
Now we have Cargolux flying
under smooth skies for a while. Unless Minister Bausch, who is in China talking
about Cargolux and Cargolux China messes something up. Though he cannot really
talk in the name of Cargolux, because as you know, he couldn’t do so before
either, Cargolux is a “private company”.
No comments:
Post a Comment