Showing posts with label Tour de France. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tour de France. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Bjarne Riis doing the Barnyard Talk about Andy Schleck


Bjarne did his barnyard talking about Andy Schleck in the Danish Ekstrabladet: Baa, baa, Andy is not going to win; Oink, oink, Andy is not disciplined; Quack, quack, he lacks the final bit!

But, tweet, tweet, Alberto Contador is almost perfect. Meow, meow, me am going to work on just some details with him (like eating contaminated Moo, moo?), and neigh, neigh, Andy's problem is that he is a contemporary of Contador.

Not much value can be extracted from the spiteful declarations of a man who was directing Andy while negotiating a deal with his immediate opponent Contador during the Tour of 2010, and not much credence comes from the man who directed Contador in 2011 and failed to have him win his 4th Tour de France.

But that barnyard talk is good to light a fire. Maybe this doesn't make Andy Schleck perfect, but hopefully enraged enough to do Ruff, ruff on the Tour 2012. Here are our friends from Velonation:

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/10740/Bjarne-Riis-Andy-Schleck-lacks-the-will-to-win-the-Tour-de-France.aspx

Or the original bjarnyardish version:

http://ekstrabladet.dk/sport/cykling/article1681268.ece

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Tour de France, Andy Schleck, Radioshack and the Leopards.

The rumor comes back. I never doubted that it would come back that there is interest between Trek and Lance Armstrong and the Schlecks to work together. Obviously the Leopard team delivered a good show, but failed the whole season.

It is just amazing how the Schlecks are advised. May I say this again, in the words of 2009? I actually don't have to change a single word about my article posted on this blog on July 31, 2009. The Schlecks are ill advised, they have unusual talent, but since 2009 they wasted 2 years listening to self-interested people, who care as much about their own careers than the Schlecks about their career.

A professional cyclist's career is limited to 10-15 years. In the meantime Andy and Frank Schleck wasted 2 years of their limited time, building the careers of those who advise them.

Here is my own advice, completely free, but exactly 2 years and 1 month old. I wouldn't change a word to it.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Luxembourg, Tour de France, Armstrong, Andy Schleck and Radioshack.

The rumor was a rumor!

The rumor we heard has already been denied: Andy Schleck won’t be in a Lance Armstrong led Radioshack team in 2010, but continue with his brother Frank Schleck in their affiliation with Saxobank.

As a consequence, Tour de France 2010 has already three main contenders: Alberto Contador, Andy Schleck and Lance Armstrong, actually the podium of Tour de France 2009. Andy Schleck being the youngest of the three seems to have the greatest potential for improvement, mostly in the time trials. And his age makes him a real candidate for the yellow jersey in Paris in 2010.

This is a good reason enough for him not to tie himself in with another ambitious leader of another team, Lance Armstrong.

A second look.

However, let’s have a look at what would have been or could have been, if Andy Schleck would have signed up with Lance Armstrong and Radioshack. It is not a futile exercise, but rather part of a necessary due diligence about a career move. A professional cyclist’s retirement age comes early. Many never have revenues that rise to the level of minimum wages. There might be 500,000 to 1,000,000 people on the slopes of Mont Ventoux. But no one pays a dime, contrary to what fans would have to shell out in any other type of sport. So our heroes are paid for their very hard work by their sponsors, or from winning prizes and from endorsements. A successful champion can have a lucrative second job as an official endorser. How lucrative that is, depends on the market, in which people identify with him. For Andy Schleck, that’s 500,000 people in Luxembourg. For Lance Armstrong, that’s 300,000,000 Americans or 600 times Luxembourg. This brings me to the interesting point of what if.

Yes, what if?

What if we had had an Armstrong-Schleck association within a Radioshack team? Andy Schleck would have had to scale back his ambition to win the Tour for another year: Lance wants to win an 8th Tour. But Andy Schleck would have learned from a great master. A man who won so many competitions, who overcame immense adversity, who has proven his courage, who demonstrates an unfailing discipline, who almost scientifically has dissected all aspects of cycling from aerodynamics to equipment and nutrition, who operates according to his plan, and in my mind who exerts some kind of mental dominance by just showing up. Though this looks like blind fiery fan talk, I believe this is a cold assessment of what that man is. He won seven Tours!

Even associated with Lance Armstrong, Andy Schleck had still a chance to win the tour in 2010. Indeed it is a long way to Paris. If not, with a mentor like Lance Armstrong, Andy Schleck would have been the top contender in 2011 and many years thereafter. So we are talking about fame delayed for one year, because of a self-imposed hiatus to learn from the master and help him achieve his 2010 goal.

There lies the interest for such an association for Andy Schleck. His association with Lance Armstrong drags him from a small regional European market for endorsements into the arms of a continental market. His association with Armstrong would have created that missing link to the American public, which is very ready and open to consider someone who spreads good vibes as one of their own. And as a daily viewer of the Tour on the US channel Versus, I witnessed the sympathetic comments that the Schleck brothers earned there on a daily basis. The US market for endorsements is already half open!

Next steps, if I may!

In these days of beer diplomacy, why wouldn’t you, the Schleck brothers, and Lance come by and have a beer with me, and we’ll sort it out.

And now, I have to say it, I can’t hold it back anymore: Radioschleck!

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Analysis: Low-profile Evans claims spectacular Tour win


I liked this analyses, as I think it is the most accurate. It corroborates opinions expressed earlier in this blog.

Schleck says he’s happy to finish on podium with brother, vows to win Tour another year


And that's a problem. Andy Schleck (and Frank Schleck) did a great Tour. They showed talent, panache and they looked overall more like old fashioned, courageous fighters. I know I repeat myself: the meticulous preparation and execution a Lance Armstrong would have deployed were not there with the Schlecks. Oh yes, I saw a picture of Andy in a wind channel. Photo-op or innovation? But Nygard's comments in this article about evaluating situations, tend to confirm that the preparation was a little bit old fashioned.
Cadel Evans prepared and executed religiously. That brought him to heaven. With less panache than Andy Schleck, but with certainly talent too, discipline and method that helped in the minutes of hardship and that most of all, brought him with significant reserves to the time trial where he could unleash that cushion of energy.

The Washington Post here has some good and enlightening comments:

Sunday, July 24, 2011

Tour de France with Andy Poulidor or was it Raymond Schleck?


The weeks to come will be the time for introspection. My headline suggests that we are in an inevitable cycle of second places, that we have known with Raymond Poulidor. Both Raymond Poulidor and Andy Schleck are fine characters and talented athletes. But is Andy Schleck doomed, like Poulidor? I like to insist on some thoughts, that I put up in my blog ….. 2 years ago, and I made a reference to it already yesterday:

http://egidethein.blogspot.com/2009/07/luxembourg-tour-de-france-armstrong.html

Now, compare that blog to the following article, in French:

http://www.eurosport.fr/cyclisme/tour-de-france/2011/evans-avait-tout-prevu_sto2882793/story.shtml

The most important lesson says this:

Invité à commenter ses trois semaines de course samedi soir, Evans a eu cette phrase: "J'ai fait un Tour cohérent." On ne saurait dire mieux. "Ça a été la clé de la course", ajoute-t-il. Il a raison. Malgré quelques pépins par ci par là, comme son problème mécanique dans le Télégraphe vendredi, il a, contrairement à tous ses adversaires, évité les fautes. Celles qui vous coûtent un Tour. Le Tour parfait n'existe pas mais Evans s'en est approché. Et ce n'est pas le fruit du hasard. "C'est l'aboutissement d'un long processus, explique John Lelangue, le manager de l'équipe BMC. On a bâti ce projet autour de Cadel voilà deux ans et tout le monde s'est mis à 100% derrière lui." "Cette année, confirme Evans, nous avons planifié soigneusement: sur l'équipe, dans les stages, l'équipementier, les ingénieurs.... Tout le monde a beaucoup travaillé pour me donner le meilleur vélo de contre-la-montre. Il y a eu beaucoup de préparation."

In one word, there has been a 2 years' quasi scientific preparation for Cadel Evans. No one will ever win the Tour again without it. Talent and panache is no longer good enough.

Congratulations to Cadel Evans, the Schleck brothers, Voeckler, Contador, and actually all the others who make to Paris today. Thank you for a great show.


Saturday, July 23, 2011

Tour de France 2011: Cadel Evans and the Schleck Brothers.


The Aussie kangaroo beat up the Red Lion badly. Cadel Evans started to impress me by mid-Tour already, when he showed that climbing a mountain wasn't going to be a problem for him. He kept well under the radar though, and didn't get attention. He also saved forces, just participating, not initiating. He actually gets upset at his peers, if they don't chase when it would be his interest. Today he was impressive, a bundle of force, yet a particular and nice style. Sturdy bike too, to support the assaults of such an unleashed beast! The kangaroo has a yellow jersey in his pouch.

The Schlecks put up a nice fight. Maybe they showed some improvement in time trials, though not significantly enough to prevail. Martin and Voeckler and Contador too went deep into their reserves.

The strategy to apply for Andy Schleck was obviously either to get to today's stage with at least 3 minutes to lose, or to be prepared at a maximum for this time trial stage. He didn't have that time cushion. Preparing for the time trial is "complicated". This starts with scouting its itinerary. I was appalled to read that Andy Schleck reconnoitered the terrain only this morning. I took some issue before with the celebrity strategy that seems to prevail at team Leopard: too many photo-ops, and probably a deficit on getting down to business. I would rather have spent several days exploring the significant stages of the Tour, up to the last turn, the last meter.

Time ago I thought Lance Armstrong would have done such a thing.

Scientifically, not public relationally. See therefore my blog from July 31, 2009:

http://egidethein.blogspot.com/2009/07/luxembourg-tour-de-france-armstrong.html

Or simply drill down to July 2009 in the blog archive on the right. Nothing has changed to the rationale. To the contrary, the 2010 and mostly the 2011 experience give the thoughts some good validation. You can't win with your mouth. Only with your legs and a scientifically prepared head and body and strategy. And our boys have the great gift of extraordinary talent, that guarantees success after a good preparation.

Please read: Luxembourg, Tour de France, Armstrong, Andy Schleck and Radioshack.

Friday, July 22, 2011

Tour de France: Andy Schleck in Yellow, Frank Schleck in Twellow.


Today's firework somehow got wet by last week's rains, I guess. It went off, but then it just puffed up the mountains. The final bouquet needed a replacement champion to jump in, Charlemagne's Rolland who thought the Alps were the Pyrenees and the Schlecks were Saracens, and he blew his horn at Alpe d'Huez. Nicely done, beating the real Saracen Alberto. A good consolation for the team and its leader who lost his yellow jersey. It was a tough day, but a heroic one for him. Sometimes alone, he looked more and more like Mrs Doubtfire struggling with that yellow outfit. But no one can doubt he was doing all he could.

The Tour is now decided, except that we don't yet know for sure if it is decided in favor of Schleck or Evans. Which of course we can blame on Johny Schleck, Andy's and Frank's father: we are talking about poor planning here. Why isn't there a third brother Schleck?! One who would have 3 minutes on Evans now? And anyway, when by tomorrow Cadel Evans is beaten by both your boys, weren't you aware that a podium has three steps, and could accommodate three Schlecks!?

I unfortunately haven't any other wisdom to share for tomorrow. In all Evans (sic), the clock will be the enemy.

The Schleck Brothers, Tour de France, Stage 19 to Alpe d'Huez.


My global syndicated Sports and Culture Page. We all know Frère Jacques, don't we? Remember your kindergarten teacher? This is just lyrics of the day. Now sing along! And make it sound enthusiastic!


Frères Schlek-ke,

Frères Schlek-ke,

Dormez-vous?

Dormez-vous?

Sonnez Thomas Voeckler,

Sonnez Cadel Evans!

Conta dort,

Conta dort.


See you remembered. I loved your accent!

The year Andy Schleck won TWO Tours de France.


I kept quiet for a while, I couldn't gauge my men over the last two or three days. I couldn't really hold my breath, without turning blue, until uncertainty would subside. Now it has.

Gone for at least a day are the hesitation waltzes, the watch me, I watch you, the fine calculations similar to a pharmacist's count, whether to take risk already 50 yards from the arrival, or later, or to do a really crazy thing 100 yards away. No one showed even a glimmer of strategy, and tactics were rudimentary. Yet people suffered. The Tour is a big deal, excruciating, dangerous. But somehow we were missing the champion who showed guts, who would do his thing, show us, get us out of our armchairs. I missed my old hero Charly Gaul, the Angel of the Mountains, a climber as the world has never seen again. A legend who would defy gravity, and punish his opponents on the scary slopes of Galibier.

Andy Schleck couldn't wait for the Galibier. So there he went in the Izoard which not only made for a marvelous display of guts, but even for good tactics, the finest the Schleck brothers can play, and only brothers can play: it is fine if the other one wins.

So here it goes. Monfort is dispatched up front. Andy attacks, not looking left and right, leaving Frank in Contadors back, like a mosquito. Andy joins forces with team mate Monfort. He will either succeed going the whole way up the Galibier, but if not, the alternative kicks in. If the peloton, or rather the survivors of the peloton will catch up with Andy. Therefore Contador has to the work, maybe even Cadel Evans, maybe Voeckler the man in yellow if he has juices left. If that happens, Frank Schleck, doing no work, will be fresh enough to immediately place his own attack, and that would probably be much closer to the arrival. Barring unforeseen weakness, one of the Schlecks had to win.

Now we know how it turned out. Fine strategy, because it was. The Schlecks didn't have to play the alternative solution. Andy Schleck, though weaker on the last 2 km, seemed surprisingly fresh. Compare that to Voeckler, one step away from intensive care. as for Contador, I'm inviting him to come to Florida and try to beat me. Privately I claim to be the local King of the Mountain. As for the man under the radar, he had to come out today. Cadel Evans had to limit his losses all by himself. He needs still to be taken care of tomorrow, or he will remain a contender.

I would by now think that Schleck will win the Tour. I don't yet know for sure if it is Andy or Frank. If it is Andy, he might actually win 2 Tours de France the same year: the Tour 2011 and also the Tour 2010 if Contador is found guilty later in August when the delayed = denied justice will be spoken.

Saturday, July 9, 2011

Tour de France 2011. C'est compliqué. But today gave some visibility over the complicated Schleck-Contador battle.


C'est compliqué! It's complicated! This is an expression used and abused by one of the French commentators of the Tour on TV 5. That's why I prefer Versus. It is less complicated.

It's complicated in this case means anything: it's difficult, unknown, unforeseen, cold, slippery, fast, slow, warm, steep, left turn, right turn, break away, win the jersey, lose it, the Château on the river, Clenbuterol, the Church steeple of Issy-les-Moulineaux ,substance abuse, fall, get up, and actually complicated. I never knew it was so complicated.

Today, I had an uncomplicated day watching the 8th stage arriving at Super Besse. The last climb was giving me the first hint for some believable predictions: indeed, Schleck placed a banderillo on Contador. All things happened in a plausible sequence. Contador by now has to go on the offensive every time that the circumstances, such as terrain, demand it. He has to try again and again to inflict damage and seconds on Schleck. Here are the bad news for Contador as of today: there isn't just one Schleck to beat, but two, he has lost precious time which forces him into the offensive, his style of dancing on his pedals, which usually is the hallmark of a great climber, was far less elegant than usual and he was straining. Most importantly, he couldn't get rid of the two Schlecks. Believe it, this was a brutal test of everyone's limits. Short but brutal. In one word: compliqué.

Andy Schleck seemed calm, concentrated and uncomplicated. He didn't seem operating at the outer edges of his possibilities. Bjarne Riis, Contador's new and Schleck's former director must have noticed. It is getting compliqué. Tonight Contador has to wonder how complicated this has become.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Tour de France 2011: What is Contador doing there and why he could beat Schleck (Andy that is).

No secret here, I want to make clear that my preference is to see Andy Schleck win this year's Tour de France. He might have actually won last year's. The jury is still open indeed to have Contador's victory in 2010 annulled. A ridiculous delaying postpones a final decision on Contador's fate until after this year's Tour, in August. This is sheer dishonest maneuvering. And from my point of view Contador cannot get back into my esteem, despite his considerable talent: his unfair exploitation of Andy Schleck's chain incident in 2010 has exposed a contorted character. He is not a gentleman as we should all expect from a great champion.

This said, Contador might be again this year's winner, as I have feared all along. Therefore I refrained from commenting on this blog, as I watched the discrepancies between Contador's and Schleck's preparation for the Tour. I hoped by now Schleck would mentally dominate Contador, but Contador was able to plant some banderillos. Never mind the more than 1 minute time he lost in the first two stages. He is in super form and Schleck is not. I hope I'm wrong, but my fears over the last months might alas unfold under our eyes.

Those fears are that the launch of the Leopard Team was a big show, almost a patriotic event, that confirmed the status of a primadonna, who doesn't even have to rehearse and everything will fall together. The Team hired more primadonnas, and I wondered who was going to fetch the water. All first violins, but no orchestra. I have come to believe though that actually the orchestra works better than I thought, so far.

Winning however will be one man's feat. There will be days of reckoning where one man has to get to the top of the podium all by himself.

What makes the winner? I would paraphrase Albert Einstein in saying that it is 20% talent and 80% of hard work. Though Contador and Andy Schleck have different morphologies, both have physical features that make them perfect engines and complements to their mechanical machines. That's a given.

The 80% of hard work cover many aspects: physical and mental training, discipline, diet, perfecting style and machine. I don't know for sure, but I believe and rumor has it, that Contador has been the more zealous student this year. But I still cheer for the guy next to the heater in the back of the class room.

There is an overarching unquantifiable element to success: though Schleck gave the wrong answer in the mur de Mûr, and got that banderillo from Contador, and a precious reminder of all the above, he has been lucky. Napoleon asked when presented with a candidate for Maréchal de France: "Is the man lucky?" An impressive question to base a mission critical decision on it! Andy Schleck has been lucky so far.

I just changed my mind: Scleck wins, but which one? Because Contador has been unlucky and doesn't stop falling off his bike, a former Schleck specialty.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Luxembourg's Andy Schleck hooked a contador.

Andy Schleck got lucky again: he caught a very nice pike in (cold) Luxembourg. That fish is of the family of the contadors. Some say it is not good for consumption. It ranges high in the food chain, which loads it with clenbuterol.

This is the second stroke of luck for Andy Schleck, as he might also become the winner of the Tour de France 2010. He doesn't know it yet. But again, clenbuterol is the common denominator here, as the other Contador ate a whole asthmatic Spanish cow during the Tour de France 2010. The bronchodilator clenbuterol someone had prescribed to that cow, might have given Contador a breezer, but also a positive anti doping test.

Andy Schleck is magnanimous about both contadors: he argues it is catch and release only. Good at least that he didn't eat that fish! He would have had his own food contamination. Let's see if the other Contador gets released too.

You think this is a fisherman's tall tale? See for yourself:

http://plixi.com/photos/original/59335600

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Luxembourg Team On Schedule For 2011 Debut | Cyclingnews.com


An expected development:

Luxembourg Team On Schedule For 2011 Debut | Cyclingnews.com

Surprisingly, a "National Team Luxembourg" runs a bit counter Luxembourg's historical experience with the Tour de France. Though "National" used to mean strictly nationals as team members. Charly Gaul would never have won the Tour de France because of the scarcity of good Luxembourg team members. It took a mixed Dutch-Luxembourg team to provide a reservoir of good domestiques to help him win the Tour 1958.

Returning to the national concept is no longer the same: it is all about the backers, which still are not well known I do hope that all this goes well. Luxembourg isn't a country that will provide many consistent backers. It is too small. For the same reason, it doesn't offer endorsement opportunities as, say, the United States.

Cycling is an immensely popular sport in Europe. But spectators don't pay. Contracts pay a little, but endorsements will make the successful athlete's living. Therefore, I stick to my guns of last year and maintain the Schlecks should have teamed up with Lance Armstrong's Radio Shack when the opportunity came knocking. Please revisit:

If they had done so, imagine how the Tour de France 2010 would have evolved. Lance Armstrong would have recognized his weakness early on, releasing Andy Schleck out of a helper situation. Andy Schleck would have gotten better advice from that team than from Bjarne Riis, his sports director who secretly already knew that he would team up with .... Alberto Contador in 2011! Betrayal?

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Tour de France: Luxembourg's Schleck vs Contador.

Alberto Contador is set to win the Tour de France 2010 just 39 seconds ahead of Andy Schleck. One can indeed assume that nothing else is going to happen in tomorrow's last stage to Paris, except the usual pranks.

In your wildest dreams, you cannot figure out such a dramatic scenario: Contador wins with exactly those 39 seconds he stole from Andy Schleck in the 15th stage, when he attacked Schleck who had a mechanical incident. An attack in those circumstances is a no-no in the peloton's ethics code.

Then Contador lied a little bit about not knowing of the incident.

Then he apologized, saying he should not have done it.

Then he obviously held back on the Tourmalet to leave the stage victory to Schleck. Some read chivalry into that, some read guilt into that, which in the circumstance is all the same: chivalry induced by guilt. Germans call it "Wiedergutmachung."

The Gods of the Mountains were very malicious: they had Schleck and Contador in a tie. Today's time trial result speaks the final Truth, and it is one of those dramas about the Tour. It denies the moral confirmation to the champion Contador as it favors Schleck: he lost the Tour by exactly the amount of seconds stolen by Contador.

Contador really doesn't "win" the Tour: he fails to clear that doubt by failing to get at least one second more than the 39 seconds he stole in the 15th stage. It is certainly not a clear win. In some way, abusing the code of honor comes back to haunt Contador. Just a little. Who will remember this year's 15th stage comes 2011?

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Tour de France: Schleck vs Contador.

Alright, there you have it. The Gods of the Mountains put on their angry misty hats and had Schleck and Contador sort it out. Schleck on the attack, Contador as matador. Schleck showed strength, Contador the convincing style of a climber. Both were equally strong. Maybe Contador didn't insist to win the stage in the final sprint: bad conscience from his "chain reaction" on Monday, when the temptation to attack Schleck, who had a chain problem, was too great.

Contador also never led today, which is only partly understandable: Schleck was the challenger, but with his help, Contador put time between himself and all other contenders. But Schleck did all the work. Schleck didn't seem to hold any grudge after both arrived on top of the Tourmalet.

The Tour might be over right now. In the history of the Tour there is that moment, as the one we see now, when the final explanation has taken place.

However, getting back to Contador's chain reaction, where he stole 39 seconds, he really has one unfinished business: he has to win the Tour with at least 40 seconds ahead of Schleck, not 8, and honor is save. Though it is not over until the fat lady sings. Who could that be?

In the meantime, hats off for Versus Television, for their excellent reporting.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Tour de France: Schleck vs Contador.

Alberto Contador is sorry that people think he should not have won the yellow jersey the way he did. It took him some coaching and the time to set up for a damage control interview in his room to profer a "lo siento". Anyone familiar with the sport didn't need so much time, but jumped at the view of Contador sprinting away from his main competitor, beating not him but his failing bike. The pistolero, whom I always considered as a world class champion, has lost class. Maybe by tomorrow he'll lose the champion title too. The pistolero, mimicking shooting his guns when winning a stage, just robbed the bank for a short time gain. He lost in attractiveness as a role model, which is for a professional athlete the equivalent of losing sponsors' money, the long term gain for being a hero.

But, for one thing, the pistolero brought a lot of passion to the Tour that otherwise has been already one of the best in recent years.

Today Alberto should have time to scrutinize the horizon, as the Gods of the Mountains are waiting for him tomorrow. They seem to disapprove and put on their angry faces and cloudy hats. They cannot be talked out of the Truth, one cannot tell them "I'm sorry" , and they'll punish those who don't obey their rules.

http://www.letour.fr/2010/TDF/LIVE/us/1700/etape_par_etape.html

Monday, July 19, 2010

Tour de France: Schleck vs Contador.

Today's stage in the Pyrenees was all set to be one where the Truth about leadership would come out. And it did in a big way.

It was to separate the best from the second best, and it did so in a perverse way: the best was relegated to second place. A mechanical incident threw the attacking Schleck out of the moment. Moment that Contador used to make a difference.

On the day the Tour de France celebrates the 100's anniversary of the inclusion of the Pyrenees in the track of the race, Contador's seizing of the moment flies into the face of the chivalrous tradition of this grand sport. There have been memorable battles between champions. There has been a sort of code of honor not to take advantage of a situation born out of bad luck such as a mechanical incident or a crash. That gentlemanly behavior was not Contador's today. He might win the Tour, with a bitter after taste. Contador, you don't do those things without consequences.

Of course sneaky behaviors and betrayals of trust have existed before. Speaking about another such incident and inelegant behavior involving a Luxembourg champion, let's revisit the Tour 1958. Charly Gaul who was one of the serious contenders for a final win, virtually lost his chances in the 19th stage, where he had a mechanical incident. Raphael Geminiani (and others) took advantage to relegate Gaul at more than 16 minutes. Two stages later an angry Gaul shook up the whole field in a punishing 21st stage. Not only did he do it, he announced that he was going to do it on the departing line. The press said on that day that Charly Gaul "the Angel of the Mountains" had become "the Demon of the Mountains."

Contador, I wish you in the days to come to be confronted by the true leader. Prepare not to meet "Andy" Schleck, but "Angry" Schleck.

Monday, June 28, 2010

A Luxembourg Team around the Schleck Brothers? What about Lance Armstrong?

There we are, one year later. The Schlecks are going to leave Saxo Bank Team and join a "Luxembourg based team."
Please see the story here at Velonation.

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/4690/Bjarne-Riis-responds-to-Andersens-new-Luxembourg-ProTour-team-Schlecks-likely-gone.aspx

I'm not sure what this team will be. It is bad strategy to announce this at 5 days before the beginning of the Tour de France. But you could argue that it is Ok. It is proof of a high self-confidence ahead of the biggest event of the year.

But is it meticulously preparing a career, that as everyone knows considers Lance Armstrong as a retired participant? What can a Luxembourg team bring to the Schlecks except the fact that both are the guaranteed leaders? We all know that in this short career, income derived from corporate endorsements beats wins and salaries. Therefore my post from last year is still as to the point as last year. Please go and have a look here:

http://egidethein.blogspot.com/2009/07/luxembourg-tour-de-france-armstrong.html